Posts tagged as:

Panasonic

Olympus E-P1 @ iphonephotovideo.com iphone photo video iPod Touch itouch iCameraOK, I say it outright and go on the record – the new Panasonic DMC-GF1 will fail!

Sure, it beats the Olympus E-P1 left and right in almost all the specs. But Panasonic made one design decision that is going to haunt them and ultimately cause the failure of the GF1: In-lens image stabilization (IS). This means that only Panasonic’s own, image-stabilized micro four-third lenses will provide IS for the GF1. Put on any four-third lens through an adaptor, even Panasonic’s own four-third IS lenses, and you will lose IS.

This is crazy! They should have followed Olympus’ example. The E-P1 has in-body IS, which means that any micro four-third lens or any other lens attached via an adaptor will not impact IS on the E-P1. Any lens, including Zeiss and Leica glass! It is a no-brainer what I would choose.

Even in the DSLR market, in-body IS will win in the long term. Sure, in-lens IS offers probably one additional stop of stabilization, which is important for professionals. Thus, Canon and Nikon, with their huge Pro base to serve, keep turning out in-lens IS (or VR – vibration reduction in Nikon-speak) and their users keep paying for it over and over again with every lens they purchase. But the rest of the market has already moved to in-body IS, since it makes ANY lens stabilized. Especially the smaller players, such as Olympus, Pentax and Sigma, which are facing tough times, have no choice but to offer in-body IS. They need third-party lens manufacturers such as Tokina, Sigma and Tamron to stay competitive, because they cannot afford developing enough lenses on their own. Once Nikon, the smaller of the two big players, starts to move to in-body IS, the game is over.

Frankly, if I had to re-buy my entire equipment today, I would have a very hard time justifying the extra hundreds of dollars Canon charges for every of their (otherwise great) IS lenses. I would be very much tempted to move over to Sony and use a combination of Sony and third-party lenses instead, especially if you buy any camera with an APS-C crop factor sensor.

For a travel camera like any micro four-third system, I simply do not want to lock myself into Panasonic through their in-lens IS camera. As always, the investment is in the glass, not the body. Going with the Olympus E-P1 will protect that investment even if I were to switch at a later time. As long as the new camera has in-body IS, I’m fine. Which is exactly, why I will not look at the Panasonic GF1, if and when I decide to get a micro four-third as a travel camera.

p.s.
Our apologies that the Weekend Musings appear on a week-day due to the long weekend we just had.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

My next ideal travel camera?

by Veit on 09/02/2009

Panasonic DMC-GF1 @ iphonephotovideo.com iphone photo video ipod touch itouch ipad itablet icameraAs expected, it did not take long for Panasonic to answer the challenge that Olympus threw at them. Today, they announced the Panasonic DMC-GF1 micro 4/3 camera system. Weighing 30% less than the Olympus E-P1 while featuring the same dimensions, the Panasonic also includes a built-in Flash and a Flash hot-shoe, which can hold an optional electronic viewfinder. In addition to a 20mm/f1.7 pancake lens and a 45mm/f2.8 Macro, Panasonic also published a lens roadmap for 2010 that includes a 100-300mm f/4-5.6 OIS, 8mm f/3.5 fisheye, and a 14mm f2.8 prime lens. Of course, you can attach both Panasonic’s and Zeiss’ 4/3 lenses through an adaptor.

I look forward to reading hands-on tests with this camera, since the Panasonic certainly has the potential to replace the Olympus E-P1 as my ideal travel camera.

Availability: Fall 2009
Price: $900 including either the 20mm or the 45mm lens

OrionGadgets.com

  • Share/Bookmark

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Oppo Blu Ray player Samsung @ iphonePhotoVideo.com iphone photo video iPod Touch iTouch iCamera iPad
I know that blu-ray players don’t have anything directly to do with the iPhone or iPod Touch.  Although, like the Pioneer Elite receivers I discussed in a previous post, you could plug your iPhone or iPod into the front USB connector on some of these newer blu-ray players and playback video, audio and photos.

But, I’m assuming, based on the demographics of our valued readers, that many of you have or will buy blu-ray players.  Since I have had experience now with 3 top of the line players, I thought I would pass this experience on to you and hopefully it will aid you in your own buying decisions.

Samsung Player crashed and froze

The first blu-ray player I bought, in December 2008, was the Samsung BD-P2500.  It was a variant of the BDP2500 that was specifically made available for sale through Best Buy.  Its main claim to fame is/was its video transcoding and rendering processor, the Silicon Optix Reon HQV, as well as one of the first blu-ray players to stream Netflix via its ethernet connection to your home network.  The Samsung’s quality of video rendering and its up-converting of standard definition DVDs was breathtaking…BUT…

The problem was that the player was not ready for production.  Samsung rushed it to market without adequate QA and bug-fixing.  After 4 months or so, the player started to freeze unpredictably and intermittently on disks – even new ones that I had just unwrapped and was playing for the first time.

I looked in the online forums for Samsung blu-ray player owners, and the numerous horror stories regarding this and other Samsung blu ray players were dismaying.  The stories (in the hundreds) showed Samsung’s basic contempt for its customers.  ‘Buy our expensive products that aren’t production ready and then we will ignore you.’  Contrast this with Microsoft, which retroactively extended its Xbox 360 warranties to cover the dreaded ‘red ring of death’, which affected me. I sent in my Xbox 360 and had it back fixed in 2 weeks having spent not a single penny. If Apple can match that customer experience let me know.

And, by the way, I had checked the forums prior to purchasing my Samsung blu-ray player but the problems really didn’t start to surface en masse until after my purchase.

I tried updating the firmware, but this didn’t help (and many others complained of turning their 2500s/2550s into bricks when they did the updates – another bug that Samsung didn’t address prior to releasing to market).  When I looked at my warranty, I realized that it covered 1 year of parts but only 3 months of labor.  I called Samsung and was told that it would cost me $85 in labor plus shipping both ways.  So, in other words, to fix a problem caused by the manufacturer, I would have to pay over $100 on a purchase of $350.  Since I had not bought the warranty from Best Buy, I had no recourse there.

So, I wrote an e-mail (and a subsequent e-mail when he didn’t respond to the first) to Tim Baxter, the President of Samsung North America. I explained that I had previously owned Samsung DVD players and other products, and been a satisfied customer.  I told him what I’ve told you above, and explained that he could either fix my blu-ray deck and keep me as a satisfied customer or turn me into a lifelong avoider of Samsung products and that I would use my voice to tell others, truthfully, what I had experienced.  He never bothered to respond.

LG failed, too

The next blu-ray player I bought was an LG BD-390, LG’s top-of-the-line blu-ray deck which has all the bells and whistles and sells for around $350.  I bought this one from Best Buy as well.  In short, it had a good picture but not stunning compared to the Samsung.  It had problems with a number of blu ray disks that I hadn’t had problems with on the Samsung (when the Samsung was working that is), and even gave me the equivalent of a Microsoft blue screen of death (”BSOD”) onscreen during a blu-ray disk being played!  I returned it for a refund to Best Buy within the 30 days of purchase.

Oppo works great!

But this tragic story of woe actually ends well.  I bought an OPPO BDP-83 blu-ray deck from Amazon.  Oppo has a great reputation and it’s easy to see why.  Instead of rushing its blu-ray player to market as Samsung does/did, it did an alpha and beta program to perfect its players and had early trial customers VOTE on whether it was ready for production!  The Oppo comes with an Anchor Bay VRS video processor (Anchor Bay now owns DVDO, a former leader in standalone video scalers and transcoders) which does a beautiful job. It also plays DVD-Audio and Super Audio CDs.  It comes beautifully packaged – talk about an ‘unboxing’ experience!  It’s clear that Oppo respects its customers, cares deeply about its products and stands behind the quality of its work.

I have had not a single disk problem with the Oppo and the image quality is beautiful.  Easily as good or better than the Samsung.

Panasonic good on the lower end

If you want a great lower-end blu-ray, I understand that the Panasonic DMP-BD60 ($200)  or DMP-BD80 can’ t be beat, though I cannot attest to this firsthand.

The moral of this story

If you want the best blu-ray deck out there from a company that thinks you’re worthwhile and not a moron, then buy the OPPO BDP-83.

Don’t buy Samsung AV products, esp. blu-ray.   Read the forums for yourself, particularly the AVForum among others.  You will see that Samsung North America has contempt for you once you have bought the product.  Moreover, it rushes products to market long before they are production-ready.

And if you buy through Best Buy, make sure to buy the extended warranty.  This is one time when buying the in-store warranty makes a lot of sense.

As Hans and Franz on Saturday Night Live used to say, “Hear me now and believe me later”.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ Comments on this entry are closed }