<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My ideal travel camera?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iphonephotovideo.com/2009/09/my-ideal-travel-camera-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iphonephotovideo.com/2009/09/my-ideal-travel-camera-4/</link>
	<description>iPhone Photography and Video: Always in Focus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:29:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Veit</title>
		<link>http://iphonephotovideo.com/2009/09/my-ideal-travel-camera-4/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Veit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonephotovideo.com/?p=2823#comment-645</guid>
		<description>Agree, but the GF-1 will fail (see my post on &lt;a href=&quot;http://iphonephotovideo.com/2009/09/weekend-musings-only-one-winner-in-image-stabilization/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;image stabilization&lt;/a&gt;), because it only takes Panasonic micro 4/3 image stabilized (IS) lenses. Not even Panasonic&#039;s own 4/3 lenses or anyone else&#039;s IS lenses.  The Olympus&#039; in-body IS makes ANY lens image-stabilized.  For that reason alone, I would not get the GF-1, no matter how much better the GF-1 is.  The investment is in the glass, not the body!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, but the GF-1 will fail (see my post on <a href="http://iphonephotovideo.com/2009/09/weekend-musings-only-one-winner-in-image-stabilization/" rel="nofollow">image stabilization</a>), because it only takes Panasonic micro 4/3 image stabilized (IS) lenses. Not even Panasonic&#8217;s own 4/3 lenses or anyone else&#8217;s IS lenses.  The Olympus&#8217; in-body IS makes ANY lens image-stabilized.  For that reason alone, I would not get the GF-1, no matter how much better the GF-1 is.  The investment is in the glass, not the body!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hellier</title>
		<link>http://iphonephotovideo.com/2009/09/my-ideal-travel-camera-4/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hellier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphonephotovideo.com/?p=2823#comment-644</guid>
		<description>Personally I can&#039;t wait for the Pansonic GF1, very similar design, with a much clearer UI/menu structure. 

But the general movement towards large Sensor compacts is fantastic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I can&#8217;t wait for the Pansonic GF1, very similar design, with a much clearer UI/menu structure. </p>
<p>But the general movement towards large Sensor compacts is fantastic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
